Meltdown!
| Tweet | ![]() |
Meltdown!
Comet LINEAR continues to disintegrate and could
disappear completely within a few days.
July
31, 2000 -- Astronomers around the world continue to monitor
the unexpected disintegration of comet
C/1999 S4 (LINEAR). Intense solar heating apparently triggered
a massive disruption of the comet's fragile icy core when it
passed close to the Sun last week. It is still bright enough
to see through small telescopes so even amateur astronomers can
watch the comet as it dissolves. If you do plan
to look, don't wait. Experts think that comet LINEAR might
disappear completely in a few days.
Above: This R-filtered image of comet LINEAR was captured
on July 28, 2000, by M. Kidger at the Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope,
Roque de los Muchachos Observatory, La Palma, Canary Islands.
The innermost coma is elongated and rapidly fading.
The break up of a bright comet is unusual but not unprecedented.
For example, comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL-9) broke up before it
struck Jupiter in 1994. SL-9 was discovered after it fragmented,
so there is no record of what happened as it came to pieces.
With comet LINEAR, astronomers have a ringside seat for the entire
show.
"We have observed a few comets in the process of breaking
up -- comet West in 1976, comet Ikeya-Seki in 1965 and others
-- but never with so much detail as we're seeing in comet LINEAR,"
says Mark Kidger, an astronomer at the
Instituto de Astrofisica
de Canarias. Comet LINEAR's demise seems to be a bit unusual.
"Cometary splittings rarely ever lead to the rapid disappearance
of a comet like this - in fact, I don't know of another case"
![]() Sign up for EXPRESS SCIENCE NEWS delivery |
"At perihelion there are very rapid aspect changes as regions of the nucleus previously in shadow are suddenly subjected to intense heating," continued Kidger. "This causes strong thermal stresses" that may have been a primary cause of LINEAR's breakup.
Something was already amiss the day before Comet LINEAR reached perihelion at a distance of 114 million km (0.74 AU) from the Sun.
"The very first images on July 25th were enough to show me that something odd was going on," recounts Kidger. "The comet's inner coma was no longer teardrop-shaped (the solar wind flowing around the comet's head causes this shape). It had a shape like a short, fat cigar. My first thought was 'Shoemaker-Levy.' It looked just like those first images of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 after it was discovered."
Kidger's images on subsequent nights confirmed that something
dramatic was happening and he announced his findings in an International
Astronomical Union (IAU) Circular (IAUC
#7467) on July 27, 2000. As news of the breakup spread, astronomers
around the world trained their telescopes on the comet. In another
IAU Circular (IAUC
# 7468) published July 28th, three teams of observers reported
that they too saw evidence of a major event in the comet's nucleus.
Left: The breakup of Comet LINEAR. Contours
represent lines of constant brightness in Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope
R-band images of the comet (credit: Mark Kidger). This 5-frame
sequence spanning the interval from July 23rd to 27th shows the
progressive elongation and disruption of the comet's core. Each
contour map is 40 arcseconds on a side centered approximately
on the core of the comet. (Mark Kidger notes that "the unusual
aspect of the innermost contours on the July 23rd frame is because
this region was so bright that it saturated completely in the
images in a 5 second exposure. On subsequent nights the comet
was nowhere near saturation."
Unlike comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, which broke into many well-defined
bright fragments, comet LINEAR seems to be dissolving into an
amorphous haze of gas and dust.
"There is some similarity of appearance to the two
comets," says Brian Marsden of Harvard's Minor Planet Center.
"An observation by Ian Griffin in New Zealand on July 29th
shows the nucleus of C/1999 S4 (LINEAR) extended into a long,
bright string. However, it does not seem to show discrete nuclei
in that string, as D/1993 F2 (SL-9) did."
The differences between comets SL-9 and LINEAR result from
their different sizes and distances from the Sun.
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 was larger than comet LINEAR, and it broke
apart as the result of tidal stresses it experienced when it
passed less than 100 thousand kilometers from Jupiter (within
1.4 Jupiter radii from the planet's center). SL-9 was far from
the Sun (812 million km) when it fragmented and solar heating
was not the primary cause of the break up. In fact, SL-9 wasn't
even orbiting the Sun. The comet had been captured by the gravitational
pull of Jupiter and was orbiting the giant planet instead.

Above: Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, pictured
here in a Hubble Space telescope image, was broken into many
pieces during a close encounter with the planet Jupiter in 1992.
Two years later it came so close to the planet that the fragments
actually plunged into Jupiter's atmosphere. [more
information]
Comet LINEAR is a much smaller object that has been losing mass
rapidly during its approach to the Sun. The Hubble Space Telescope
recorded a house-sized fragment blowing away from the core on
July 5th and powerful jets of gas vaporized by solar radiation
have been pushing the comet to and fro. Solar heating is a more
important factor in its breakup than gravitational effects. [more information]
"The small size of comet LINEAR and its exposure to solar
radiation is causing a more complete and rapid dissolution than
we saw in Shoemaker-Levy 9," continued Marsden. "The
initial break-up of SL-9 was surely caused by tidal forces from
Jupiter. If they had not later collided with Jupiter, several
of those fragments would presumably still exist. C/1999 S4 (LINEAR),
on the other hand, will probably have completely dispersed in
a week or so."
Comet
LINEAR may still be bright enough for amateur astronomers to
view in small telescopes, but it's fading fast. On July 27th,
binocular observers in South America and Europe estimated the
comet's visual magnitude to be +6.6 [ref].
That's almost bright enough to see with the unaided eye from
dark-sky observing sites. Two days later, an experienced amateur
in the Canary Islands reported a visual magnitude of +8.3, a
factor of 6 decline in brightness.
"The surface brightness of the innermost coma is fading fast," says Kidger. "This should translate to a somewhat slower fade of the outer coma [that binocular and small telescope observers see] as the gas and dust in it disperses and is not replenished. Typically a comet may take several weeks for the coma to expand and fade down to the brightness of the sky background."Â
Above: On July 23rd, the Comet LINEAR's gaseous halo was bright and centrally condensed. Since then it has steadily faded as the core disrupts into an elongated train of debris. Credit: Mark Kidger, Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope.
Many well-known annual meteor showers, including the Perseids, Leonids and Geminids, are caused by dusty debris from comets burning up in the atmosphere of Earth. Such displays are harmless and beautiful. Unfortunately for meteor lovers, the orbit of comet LINEAR comes no closer to our planet than 28 million kilometers (0.18 AU). There will be no "Linearid" meteor shower. When comet LINEAR finally disappears from view in a few days or weeks, this memorable visitor from beyond the orbit of Neptune will be gone forever.
|
Orbital
Elements of C/1999 LINEAR S4
- from the Harvard Center for Astrophysics
Daily
Ephemeris for C/1999 LINEAR S4 - from the Harvard Center
for Astrophysics
CometLinear.com -pictures, updates, and a
discussion board for observers of comet Linear.
Comet LINEAR's Summer Show - from Sky & Telescope,
includes detailed finder charts and ephemerides.
C/1999
S4 (LINEAR) -- images and historical highlights from
Gary Kronk's popular Comets
& Meteors web site.
Join our growing list of subscribers - sign up for our express news delivery and you will receive a mail message every time we post a new story!!!
Headlines| For lesson plans and educational activities related to breaking science news, please visit Thursday's Classroom | Author: Dr. Tony Phillips Production Editor: Dr. Tony Phillips Curator: Bryan Walls Media Relations: Steve Roy Responsible NASA official: Ron Koczor |



